49 Unique Guild Members 14 Level 100 characters 401 Website/Forum Members 0 Posts in 24 hours 0 Posts in 7 days 84313 Total Posts Nelthilta is the last poster
49 Unique Guild Members 14 Level 100 characters 401 Website/Forum Members 0 Posts in 24 hours 0 Posts in 7 days 84313 Total Posts Nelthilta is the last poster
Played a few games after work with Ryan and Co. Pretty fun stuff. It's definitely an improvement from pugging every game. Felt like I could have played a lot better, but overall I probably got carried... so eh.
I'll leave it to Ryan and the others (who did we play with btw? Past and Sip?) to tell me how bad/good/mediocre I was. Regardless, playing non-pug has given LoL a little more steam for me.
Only raged pretty hard at the one fgt Tryn and the team that had literally 32 million stuns.
I may be able to log on for a couple games, but not positive. So long as it's just a friendly game. I will be coachable but don't want to be around a bunch of fighting over LoL.
I thought Crits played well, obv not greatest player ever but he did solo mid with Annie and was 2-0 up at the point where team fighting started so that's always a good sign
I may be able to log on for a couple games, but not positive. So long as it's just a friendly game. I will be coachable but don't want to be around a bunch of fighting over LoL.
Sure, but can I say hi or are you and the Holy Trinity going to jump down my throat?
By saying that I don't think a competitive game can be perfectly fair if it doesn't grant access to the same things to all parties involved?
I don't get why that's such a weird stance to you, you can argue (and I'd agree) that it's perfectly easy to theoretically be a top player with a small hero set but it doesn't change the fact that it isn't conducive to a completely fair playing field and it's not fun if the heroes you have get changed and you're forced to play hundreds of games to grab any new ones.
Hell, even arguing (based on one single example of one single game, btw) that those few heroes are the only viable ones isn't a great stance. In the DotA2 tournament, they have already picked or banned *every single hero* in the game. That's a better sign of balance than everyone picking the same shit every game, IMO. But in League the balance changes so much
Heroes that are or have been used a lot in the big tournaments that one has to buy:
Udyr, Nidalee, Morde, Ezreal, Shen, Kennen, Garen, Malz, Kog, Xin, Vlad, Galio, Urgot, Miss Fort, Sona, Irelia, Trundle, Cait, Renek, Jarvan, Nocturne, Lee Sin, Brand, Rubmle, Vayne, Orianna, Yorick
Lots of those have since been shit on with nerfs, but that is kind of the league strategy - release a broken hero, make people buy it with IP or RP to compete (especially since there aren't enough bans to go around imo, one of the other issues, league needs 8 bans)... then nerf it.
LeBlanc/Lux/maybe Leona might count too but I dunno, I'm just going by the heroes I know I've watched in tournaments
Played a few games after work with Ryan and Co. Pretty fun stuff. It's definitely an improvement from pugging every game. Felt like I could have played a lot better, but overall I probably got carried... so eh.
I'll leave it to Ryan and the others (who did we play with btw? Past and Sip?) to tell me how bad/good/mediocre I was. Regardless, playing non-pug has given LoL a little more steam for me.
Only raged pretty hard at the one fgt Tryn and the team that had literally 32 million stuns.
You didn't feed, but I carried everyone really hard.